Vehicle Restraint Systems Development
Henk Helleman has worked on a great number of vehicles. Some were more memorable than others. Below is an overview of those that stuck. Some, because a new technology was introduced, some because they were a personal first.
Fiat Tipo 2/3
Henk trained the Fiat engineers in the use of MADYMO
and helped them set up their first models for restraint systems performance evaluation.
These models were subsequently used by the restraints system supplier (Breed Technologies)
during development and for production quality control, there after.
Hyundai Elantra and Accent
Henk trained the Hyundai engineers in the use of MADYMO and helped them set up restraint system performance models.
During several extended stays in South-Korea, engineering support was provided
to develop the restraint systems for the Elantra and Accent models.
![Hyundai Accent X3 [ Hyundai Accent X3 ]](/avg/pic/Hyundai_Accent.jpg)
Bugatti EB110 Super Sport
![Bugatti EB110SS [ Bugatti EB110SS ]](/avg/pic/Bugatti_EB110.jpg)
Volvo SCC
We worked on this one in 1994, but had to keep it under wraps for almost 10 years as this
was Volvo's test bed for possible future safety technology. The vehicle was finally revealed,
as a concept, in 2001. The car has a highly adjustable steering column and adjustable pedals
to create a comfortable and safe seating position for short and tall drivers.
Very little obscures the all-around visibility and there is a cowl airbag to catch
the unfortunate pedestrian who gets hit by the car.
Only so much
has been revealed about this vehicle, so we still won't give out the details as some of the
safety technologies researched have yet to be disclosed and implemented on production vehicles.
Using simulation analysis allowed for many concepts to be investigated without the need
to build and test prototypes.
Ford of Australia Falcon
![Ford EA77 [ Ford of Australia EA77 Falcon ]](/avg/pic/FoA_Falcon.jpg)
Fiat Tipo/C
The integration of the restraint system for the Fiat Tipo/C was managed from the Breed UK office,
but the component development and testing was done in the US. The development fell in the period
that airbag inflators were switching from Azide based propellants to new generants that were more
environmentally friendly. So we got to do the performance engineering twice and simulation analysis
helped greatly to shorten the development time. Henk worked in close cooperation with the inflator
development engineers to find a matching performance for the new generants.
After a rather embarrassing consumer test, the platform also became the test bed for alternative
venting methods, using a permeable patch of fabric rather than discrete vent holes.
When the project was finished we knew more about fabric venting properties than the supplier.
Hyundai Santa-Fe
![Hyundai HP1 [ Hyundai HP1 Santa-Fe ]](/avg/pic/Hyundai_SantaFe.jpg)
Jaguar XK8
"Watch out for the suspension being a little sloppy on these development vehicles", said the Jaguar
program manager as he handed over the keys.Strictly speaking we didn't need to drive the cars for the development of the Occupant Spatial Sensor System, but we found a reason after all. We needed to test the system under driving conditions when the wind would possibly interfere with performance of the system. Road testing was much cheaper and more practical than wind tunnel testing, so off we went. 😄
BMW 3-Series
![BMW E46 [ BMW E46 ]](/avg/pic/BMW_3Series.jpg)
Ford Freestyle
For the Ford Freestyle roll-over sensors and side curtains were developed to better protect
the occupants in Roll-Over accidents. Simulation analysis was used to provide "gap-closure" timing,
which tells how much time there is to get the side curtain between the occupant and the window.
Simulation analysis was also used to provide input for the sensor development engineers to
tell the difference between sporty driving and a roll-over accident that would require
the side curtain to be deployed. Roll-over testing was still in its infancy with various
test protocols being evaluated, such as the "curb-trip", the "cork-screw", and the "dolly test"
The latter would become the standard test for FMVSS 208.
Ford Galaxy
![Ford Galaxy [ Ford C3XX ]](/avg/pic/Ford_Galaxy.jpg)
GM Epsilon II
The GM Epsilon is a global platform that formed the basis for (amongst others) the Saab 93
and 95, the Opel Insignia and Vectra,
the Saturn Aura, the Cadillac BLS, Chevy Malibu, and Pontiac G6.
With such a potentially large volume it was the focus for many innovative, cost saving technologies.
One focus was to explore whether the side curtain could be bonded together rather than sewn.
Combined fluid/structural analysis determined the strength requirements for the bonds.
That allowed various bonding methods to be evaluated for suitability.
Tesla Model S
![Tesla Model S [ Tesla Model S ]](/avg/pic/2009TeslaModelS.jpg)
Ford Ka/Figo
The Ford B562 was designated the “global, low-cost platform”. It formed the basis for both the Ford Ka,
designed for developed markets, and the Figo, slated for the rest of the world. That meant, it had to
be certified against a diverse set of regulations and meet a variety of customer expectations.
It slotted under the sophisticated B299 Fiesta model that sported a 5-star NCAP safety rating.
To not compete with its own product, the Ka was given a 4-star EuroNCAP target, with the notion
that a customer who wanted and could afford more safety, could opt for the Fiesta, instead.
The occupant safety systems were co-developed between Ford Brasil and Dearborn to be able to
cover the plurality of model iterations. The occupant crash safety of each model was improved
considerably over its immediate predecessor.
![Proton Persona [ Proton Persona ]](/avg/pic/Proton_Persona.jpg)
![Hyundai Galloper [ Hyundai Galloper ]](/avg/pic/Hyundai_Galloper.jpg)
![GM W-Body [ GM W-Body ]](/avg/pic/Chevrolet_MonteCarlo.jpg)
![Honda Accord [ Honda Accord ]](/avg/pic/Honda_Accord.jpg)
![Ford Explorer [ Ford Explorer ]](/avg/pic/Ford_Explorer.jpg)
![Honda Civic [ Honda Civic ]](/avg/pic/Honda_Civic.jpg)
![Dodge Ram [ Dodge Ram ]](/avg/pic/Dodge_DR.jpg)
![Chevy Tahoe [ Chevy Tahoe ]](/avg/pic/GMT900.jpg)
![Ford Taurus [ Ford Taurus ]](/avg/pic/Ford_Taurus.jpg)
![Dodge Caravan [ Dodge Caravan ]](/avg/pic/Dodge_Caravan.jpg)
![Lincoln MKX [ Lincoln MKX ]](/avg/pic/Ford_U387.jpg)
![Chrysler LX 300 [ Chrysler LX 300 ]](/avg/pic/Chrysler_300LX.jpg)
![Honda Pilot [ Honda Pilot ]](/avg/pic/Honda_Pilot.jpg)
![Toyota Sienna [ Toyota Sienna ]](/avg/pic/Toyota_Sienna.jpg)
![Honda Element [ Honda Element ]](/avg/pic/Honda_Element.jpg)
That isn't all of them. There are a few more, but like the Volvo SCC before, they'll have to wait a little until their technologies are revealed to the general public. Rest assured there is more innovation in the pipe-line. We'll continue to try to make airbags smarter and seat-belts more effective. There are other parts of the human body to protect and other types of crashes to protect for. Then we'll look into protecting humans rather than crash test dummies.
Then we'll work on preventing accidents altogether...